<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exploration Place logo critique</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insightdesign.com/logoblogo/logo-design-and-branding/24/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insightdesign.com/logoblogo/logo-design-and-branding/24/</link>
	<description>Logo Design Wichita</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:43:29 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.insightdesign.com/logoblogo/logo-design-and-branding/24/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>James Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insightdesign.com/logoblogo/?p=24#comment-10</guid>
		<description>This is a really nice site.  Great designs all over it.  Kind of nice to see someone brave enough to mention when bad design is... well... bad design.  
Here&#039;s my two cents: The top half is very poor, sure, but it&#039;s at least semi-visible.  Can anyone explain to me why the tag at the bottom is a light colored font in a wave, making it virtually impossible to see and even less likely to be read in the first place?  Hard on the eyes and a wash from any real distance.  If you can&#039;t read a logo from a moving car, you&#039;ve just lost business.  
Honestly, I used to be accused of making too detailed logos that were hard on the eyes.  Now, I&#039;m probably on the opposite side of the complaint department, but nobody has to guess what the client is selling... which pays better.  Just a thought. - James Dean, CLARK Marketing Solutions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really nice site.  Great designs all over it.  Kind of nice to see someone brave enough to mention when bad design is&#8230; well&#8230; bad design.<br />
Here&#8217;s my two cents: The top half is very poor, sure, but it&#8217;s at least semi-visible.  Can anyone explain to me why the tag at the bottom is a light colored font in a wave, making it virtually impossible to see and even less likely to be read in the first place?  Hard on the eyes and a wash from any real distance.  If you can&#8217;t read a logo from a moving car, you&#8217;ve just lost business.<br />
Honestly, I used to be accused of making too detailed logos that were hard on the eyes.  Now, I&#8217;m probably on the opposite side of the complaint department, but nobody has to guess what the client is selling&#8230; which pays better.  Just a thought. &#8211; James Dean, CLARK Marketing Solutions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.insightdesign.com/logoblogo/logo-design-and-branding/24/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 04:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insightdesign.com/logoblogo/?p=24#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I can only speak for myself and not anyone else at my studio, but I have to whole-heartedly agree with this critique of the Exploration Place logo. Is this a rip-off of the crappy McPherson city logo? Which came first? And on both---WHY?!?!--I could go on but I&#039;ve said enough. Let&#039;s get this logo replaced before it does any more damage! I don&#039;t like to criticize people, and this is not criticizing the designer, only the end product, which we all have to suffer from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can only speak for myself and not anyone else at my studio, but I have to whole-heartedly agree with this critique of the Exploration Place logo. Is this a rip-off of the crappy McPherson city logo? Which came first? And on both&#8212;WHY?!?!&#8211;I could go on but I&#8217;ve said enough. Let&#8217;s get this logo replaced before it does any more damage! I don&#8217;t like to criticize people, and this is not criticizing the designer, only the end product, which we all have to suffer from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
